GraphPad Prism is a genuinely good tool for what it was built for: making figures, and doing the biology-flavoured analyses that go with them. This page is not an argument against it. It is about the analyses that sit around the graph — and about what happens after the figure is done.
Prism earned its place in life-science labs because the figure is the product: a graph editor that people actually like using, with curve fitting and the conventions of biology built in. If your day is dose-response curves and figures for a manuscript, and Prism serves you, there is no reason to change on this page's account.
Magic Stat overlaps on the analyses that matter in those labs — dose-response with IC50, nonlinear curve fitting such as Michaelis-Menten, ROC and AUC, Bland-Altman, Kaplan-Meier survival with the log-rank test, and Cox regression — but it is organised differently. Every analysis, not only the graph, ends in an APA-formatted table and a report, and the method coverage reaches well beyond the life sciences into ecology, econometrics, psychometrics and SEM.
So the split is roughly this: if the figure editor is the reason you open the program, that is Prism's territory. If you need the analysis, the table and the write-up alongside the figure, that is where Magic Stat is aimed.
Dose-response: 3 parameters (3PL), 4 parameters (4PL), 5 parameters (5PL, with an asymmetry factor) and two-site models — each reporting IC50.
Curve fitting: nonlinear regression by least squares, including mechanistic models such as Michaelis-Menten.
Medical tests: ROC/AUC (DeLong CI, Youden), Bland-Altman (limits of agreement, trend and proportional-bias tests), Kaplan-Meier (product-limit) and Cox PH.
What is not here: Prism's graph editor is its own thing, and Magic Stat does not attempt to reproduce it. Figures are produced for publication; they are not edited the way Prism lets you edit them.
Not if the graph editor is why you use it. Prism is good at figure-making and at the life-science analyses that go with it; that is not a weakness to correct.
Yes — 3PL, 4PL, 5PL and two-site models, each reporting IC50 with a confidence interval.
Yes: nonlinear regression by least squares, including mechanistic models such as Michaelis-Menten.
ROC/AUC with DeLong intervals, Bland-Altman, Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards are all included.
No — a free 48-hour trial with no card, then US$990 per year.
Windows, macOS and Linux.